[Note - Title 40 United States Code [U.S.C.] section ' 255'has been changed to Title 40 U.S.C. section '3112'.
Any practical use of this document MUST include reference of the change to section '3112'at every reference that is made to section '255'.
Because ' 255' was 'repealed' and recodified any reference to '255' is a reference to a repealed code and as such is null and void.
Therefore reference to ' 3112' must accompany any mention of '255' because '3112' is the new code.
[Note - ' 3112' has no established law (no cases) to support it. It's now considered a POINT to DEBATE and DEFINE.
And that's If someone even tries to use it in Court.
Anyone trying to use it nowadays in Court without reference to ' 255' would have a REALLY hard time PROVING the POINT.
Clever, huh?
Whereas ' 255' has all the case authority. It's been decided looooong ago that this CODE has a certain meaning pertaining to a certain 'thing' [federal jurisdiction] and what its purpose is.
But it's been ' repealed'!!!! so that you can't use it anymore and make 'legal' sense.
Your arguments on that POINT are now invalid, unless you reference section '3112'.
Simply because the CODE that you're referencing has been 'repealed'.
It doesn't matter that both CODES say 'exactly' the same things, word for word.
What matters is that NO case authority will be created from now on that references '255'.
The chain of case authority (case law) is now broken unless both references are made.
So you can't use One Without the Other.
What REALLY happened is that THEY tried to loose '255' all together.
But it's there in the CODES under Constitutional Law. So THEY couldn't just leave it out.]
So without further delay......
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment